[keycloak-user] Problem using SAML IdP
Jérôme Blanchard
jayblanc at gmail.com
Thu Jan 14 06:20:53 EST 2016
Hi all,
According to shibboleth specification, IdP of a federation usually use
transient NameID which makes Shibboleth impossible to interface with
keycloak, even if we manage the Discovery Service externally in order to
maintain IdP list mapping between federation and keycloak.
It's really annoying for me and I'm trying to investigate a way to solve
this problem.
In my federation, some doc say that if you need to manage personnal user
information in your application, you have to rely on a dedicated attribute
in order to retreive real user id and not the transient opaque one. In this
case, an attribute called eduPersoneTargetedId exists and can be use by
shibboleth.
I am trying to patch the saml broker in order to take into consideration
this attribute in a kind of attributeToNameIdMapper but I have to admit
that I'm lost a bit in the code.
Do you think this approach is good ?
Best regards, Jérôme.
Le mer. 6 janv. 2016 à 09:31, Jérôme Blanchard <jayblanc at gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Hi Bill, all,
>
> In the case of a transient only nameid, would it be possible to create a
> dedicated attribute mapper in order to use for exemple the email attribute
> as name identifier ?
>
> PS : the urn:mace:shibboleth:1.0:nameIdentifier is in fact use in SAML v1
> for request a nameid that is transient also... so there is no solution in
> this way.
>
> Best regards, Jérôme.
>
> Le mar. 5 janv. 2016 à 16:13, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com> a écrit :
>
>> We won't be able to support temporary ids (transient) for awhile as it
>> requires temporary user creation which requires some rearchitecting.
>>
>> As for "urn:mace:shibboleth:1.0:nameIdentifier" if you spec it out in a
>> JIRA and it is simple enough to implement support for, we may be able to
>> get it in.
>>
>> On 1/5/2016 8:18 AM, Jérôme Blanchard wrote:
>> > Hi Bill,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your answer regarding transient and temporary ids. I
>> > understand the problem due to keycloak account creation and binding to
>> > the IdP.
>> > Renarter is using Shibboleth ; Is there is any work on shibboleth
>> > integration for keycloak ?
>> > If I look into the idps entities descriptors of renater, I found that it
>> > uses also another nameid format based on shibboleth namesapce :
>> >
>> <md:NameIDFormat>urn:mace:shibboleth:1.0:nameIdentifier</md:NameIDFormat>
>> >
>> <md:NameIDFormat>urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:transient</md:NameIDFormat>
>> >
>> > Do you think it is possible to patch the saml idp provider (or to create
>> > another one dedicated to shibboleth) in order to integrate keycloak to
>> > our identity federation (renater) ?
>> >
>> > Best whiches for this upcoming year and thanks for your great work
>> > around keycloak.
>> >
>> > Jérôme.
>> >
>> >
>> > Le mar. 22 déc. 2015 à 21:10, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com
>> > <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>> a écrit :
>> >
>> > Our brokering doesn't support temporary user ids from the "parent"
>> IDP.
>> > Transient Ids in SAML or temporary ids.
>> >
>> > On 12/22/2015 11:46 AM, Jérôme Blanchard wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I'm trying to integrate keycloak into a the french research
>> > federation
>> > > of identity (renater) and I'm facing some problems.
>> > > Actually, when IdP respond to keycloak i'm getting the following
>> > error :
>> > > PL00084: Writer: Unsupported Attribute
>> > > Value:org.keycloak.dom.saml.v2.assertion.NameIDType
>> > >
>> > > It seems that this IdP is using transient NameID policy only and
>> > using
>> > > the unspecified field in the idp config in keycloak generate this
>> > > exception as a return.
>> > >
>> > > Log of the keycloak server is joined.
>> > >
>> > > I have no idea of what happening because when I was using the
>> test
>> > > federation, everything was working but no I'm in the production
>> > > federation, login fails.
>> > >
>> > > The renater federation is using Shibolleth and keycloak is not
>> > supported
>> > > by federation moderators so I'm alone in the dark now...
>> > >
>> > > Renater provides an IdP list that I have to parse and
>> > synchronized with
>> > > IdP in keycloak. As a return I provide a list of all endpoints
>> > for each
>> > > keycloak registered IdP to allow federation IdP to answear
>> > correctly to
>> > > the right endpoint. All of this is done by a small web app
>> deployed
>> > > aside keycloak and using REST API to synchronize all the IdP.
>> > >
>> > > One of the IdP entity descriptor is joined. As you can see, only
>> > > transient nameid policy is supported and if I configure keycloak
>> > to use
>> > > email or persistent, I received a response saying that the nameid
>> > is not
>> > > supported :
>> > >
>> > > <samlp:AuthnRequest
>> > xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"
>> > > xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"
>> > >
>> > AssertionConsumerServiceURL="
>> https://demo-auth.ortolang.fr/auth/realms/ortolang/broker/2db5eab3f83cbaa5a322dcf3f9ac552d/endpoint
>> "
>> > > Destination="https://janus.cnrs.fr/idp/profile/SAML2/POST/SSO"
>> > > ForceAuthn="false" ID="ID_c53b5759-cb97-4e95-b540-877a7a6c625d"
>> > > IsPassive="false" IssueInstant="2015-12-22T16:13:15.987Z"
>> > > ProtocolBinding="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:bindings:HTTP-POST"
>> > > Version="2.0"><saml:Issuer
>> > >
>> > xmlns:saml="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion">
>> https://demo-auth.ortolang.fr/auth/realms/ortolang
>> </saml:Issuer><samlp:NameIDPolicy
>> > > AllowCreate="true"
>> > >
>> >
>> Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:emailAddress"/></samlp:AuthnRequest>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > <saml2p:Response
>> xmlns:saml2p="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"
>> > >
>> > Destination="
>> https://demo-auth.ortolang.fr/auth/realms/ortolang/broker/2db5eab3f83cbaa5a322dcf3f9ac552d/endpoint
>> "
>> > > ID="_9d03761957aade819b6823c35bbab278"
>> > > InResponseTo="ID_c53b5759-cb97-4e95-b540-877a7a6c625d"
>> > > IssueInstant="2015-12-22T16:13:16.420Z"
>> Version="2.0"><saml2:Issuer
>> > > xmlns:saml2="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"
>> > >
>> > Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entity">
>> https://janus.cnrs.fr/idp</saml2:Issuer><saml2p:Status><saml2p:StatusCode
>> > >
>> >
>> Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Responder"><saml2p:StatusCode
>> > >
>> >
>> Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:InvalidNameIDPolicy"/></saml2p:StatusCode><saml2p:StatusMessage>Required
>> > > NameID format not
>> > >
>> supported</saml2p:StatusMessage></saml2p:Status></saml2p:Response>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Any help would be gracefully appreciated.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks a lot, Jérôme.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > keycloak-user mailing list
>> > > keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org>
>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Bill Burke
>> > JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> > http://bill.burkecentral.com
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > keycloak-user mailing list
>> > keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>> >
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20160114/e862cc57/attachment.html
More information about the keycloak-user
mailing list