[keycloak-user] Keycloak 2.2.1 Overlay on EAP 6.4.x

Stian Thorgersen sthorger at redhat.com
Mon Oct 17 12:06:49 EDT 2016


Sure, we'll add it to the overlay zip itself as that can be automated and
doesn't require manually updating.

On 14 October 2016 at 13:45, Jeremy Simon <jeremy at jeremysimon.com> wrote:

> Ok, thank you for the info.  Is that some which could be more
> specially details in the docs?  (a humble compatibility matrix?)
> jeremy
> jeremy at jeremysimon.com
> www.JeremySimon.com
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > Overlay is only supported on WidlFly 10 and EAP 7.
> >
> > On 13 October 2016 at 19:48, Stan Silvert <ssilvert at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know if the overlay dist is meant to run on EAP 6.4 or not.  I
> >> do admit that I never tested the overlay dist against EAP 6.4 after we
> >> got rid of keycloak-server.json.
> >>
> >> However, to do the upgrade, you don't want to use the
> >> keycloak-install.cli.   That cli script is only for an overlay onto a
> >> server that has never had Keycloak installed before.
> >>
> >> For an upgrade, the procedure is to migrate your standalone.xml from the
> >> old server.  Then you can use the migrate-json operation.  That is
> >> documented in the "Migration from older versions" section of the server
> >> admin guide.  That guide recommends that you do the operation in
> >> embedded mode, but that is not required.
> >>
> >> Stan
> >>
> >> On 10/13/2016 1:22 PM, Jeremy Simon wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > Is Keycloak 2.2.1's overlay supported on JBoss EAP 6.4.x (or
> >> > thereabouts)?  It appears it's more geared solely for Wildfly.  We
> >> > noticed the overlay is missing the keycloak specific standalone XML
> >> > with SPI configurations.  And in the bin directory of the overlay,
> >> > there's a keycloak-install.cli which has an 'embed-server' command
> >> > that EAP doesn't seem recognize.
> >> >
> >> > Previously we were on 1.7, running on EAP 6.4.  We're in the process
> >> > of upgrading our custom SPIs and noticed things are a bit different!
> >> > Any insight appreciated!
> >> >
> >> > jeremy
> >> > jeremy at jeremysimon.com
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > keycloak-user mailing list
> >> > keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> keycloak-user mailing list
> >> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-user mailing list
> > keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>


More information about the keycloak-user mailing list