[keycloak-user] Clustering Keycloak via TCP
Bill Burke
bburke at redhat.com
Mon Feb 27 10:24:18 EST 2017
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY10/Infinispan+Subsystem
The only thing in keycloak that needs to leverage clustering/JGroups is
our Infinispan cache for Keycloak SSO Sessions. I've never personally
tried to use a different JGRoups stack. I believe you can set the
"stack" attribute in the transport tag. Let me know if you get it
working. I"ll expand on our docs.
<subsystem xmlns="urn:jboss:domain:infinispan:4.0">
<cache-container name="keycloak" jndi-name="infinispan/Keycloak">
<transport lock-timeout="60000"stack="tcp"/>
On 2/27/17 9:57 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was wondering, has Keycloak been tested using Wildfly 10.1 TCP based
> Jgroups? I'm told that the TCP ports are lazy, and I'm never seeing them
> come up. It looks like Keycloak doesn't have a war file, no web.xml and as
> a result no distributable flag.
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
More information about the keycloak-user
mailing list