[keycloak-user] Unicast

[Marc Tempelmeier]

Hi,

thanks, we went with docker swarm, where we have other services already. So I want to try to get the unicast working.
I´ll take a look at JDBC_PING though.



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Schuster Sebastian (INST/ESY1) [mailto:Sebastian.Schuster at bosch-si.com] 
Gesendet: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:31 PM
An: Marc Tempelmeier <marc.tempelmeier at flane.de>; keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
Betreff: RE: Unicast

Hi Marc,

I don't have production experience with it yet, but you can setup JGroups discovery to use the DB (JDBC_PING) instead of multicast.
You can see how this works on Kubernetes and MySQL for example at https://github.com/Reposoft/keycloak-ha-kubernetes/tree/keycloak3-ha-mysql/server-ha-mysql. Using Minikube (https://github.com/kubernetes/minikube) you will have a Keycloak cluster running in no time (if you don’t try to mount persistent volumes for the DB from the host as I did :)

Best regards,
Sebastian

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards

 Sebastian Schuster

Engineering and Support (INST/ESY1)
Bosch Software Innovations GmbH | Schöneberger Ufer 89-91 | 10785 Berlin | GERMANY | www.bosch-si.com Tel. +49 30 726112-485 | Fax +49 30 726112-100 | Sebastian.Schuster at bosch-si.com

Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg; HRB 148411 B
Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Rainer Kallenbach, Michael Hahn 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: keycloak-user-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:keycloak-user-
> bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Marc Tempelmeier
> Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 15:36
> To: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> Subject: [keycloak-user] Unicast
> 
> Hi,
> 
> does someone here use unicast instead of multicast to form a cluster?
> 
> If yes, I would be interested in the config :)
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Marc
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user