[keycloak-user] shared UMA 2.0 resource & scope based policies

[Marek Lindner]

On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 20:40:43 HKT Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> +1. Or just use the "permissions" response mode while that PR is not merged.

What's the permission response mode you are referring to ?

Regards,
Marek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20190116/93b95441/attachment-0001.bin