[mod_cluster-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (MODCLUSTER-549) mod_proxy_cluster should display the full version string of httpd it was built with

[Radoslav Husar (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MODCLUSTER-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13314900#comment-13314900 ] 

Radoslav Husar commented on MODCLUSTER-549:
-------------------------------------------

I think this is a good idea in general. (I would prefer to use a different format than delimited by underscore as the version name just gets too long.)

> mod_proxy_cluster should display the full version string of httpd it was built with
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MODCLUSTER-549
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MODCLUSTER-549
>             Project: mod_cluster
>          Issue Type: Enhancement
>          Components: Native (httpd modules)
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.13.Final, 1.3.5.Final
>            Reporter: Michal Karm Babacek
>            Assignee: Michal Karm Babacek
>
> This is a suggestion to display: {code}
> [Tue Oct 25 12:48:18 2016] [notice] Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) DAV/2 mod_cluster/1.2.13.Final_httpd-2.2.15-39.el6.x86_64 configured -- resuming normal operations
> {code} instead of the current version string {code}
> [Mon Oct 31 06:31:31 2016] [notice] Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) DAV/2 mod_cluster/1.2.13.Final configured -- resuming normal operations
> {code}
> The motivation is to clearly state with which httpd it is safe to to run mod_proxy_cluster modules so as to avoid mysterious SegFaults caused by "I took these mod_proxy_cluster modules build with httpd x and run them with httpd y and it all seemed to be good up until...".
> I'm not absolutely sure this is the right place to do so though. I'd like to hear from [~rhusar] and [~jfclere] to either upvote this enhancement or to downvote it into oblivion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.2#72004)