Deprecating ChannelPipelineCoverage?

[Mike McGrady]

Hi, Trustin,

I think that the present annotations are more explicit.  The present  
annotations say what is actually happening.  The stateful and  
stateless annotations would not actually fit what is happening with my  
code.  I use stateful code with "all" and this is not a problem.  If  
the annotation were changed I would have "stateless" as the annotation  
but have a stateful handler.

Mike

On Nov 8, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Trustin Lee (이희승) wrote:

> What do you think about replacing ChannelPipelineCoverage with more
> explicit annotations such as @Stateful and @Stateless?
>
> ChannelPipelineCoverage has a confusing name (at least for a
> beginner), and its value cannot be validated on compile time because
> it's string.
>
> — Trustin Lee, http://gleamynode.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> netty-dev mailing list
> netty-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-dev

Mike McGrady
Principal Investigator AF081-028 AFRL SBIR
Senior Engineer
Topia Technology, Inc.
1.253.720.3365
mmcgrady at topiatechnology.com