Deprecating ChannelPipelineCoverage?

[benshu]

> Good point.  Then, do you have some suggestion for a better name than
> ChannelPipelineCoverage, or do you think it's just fine?  I think
> there might be a better name that makes it easier to understand. 

How about @ChannelMultiplicity(Multiplicity.ONE) and
@ChannelMultiplicity(Multiplicity.MANY) respectively.

With kind regards
Ben Schulz
-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Deprecating-ChannelPipelineCoverage-tp3969888p3970663.html
Sent from the Netty Developer Group mailing list archive at Nabble.com.