Deprecating ChannelPipelineCoverage?

[Christian Migowski]

Hi Trustin,

I do like your suggestion as the present @ChannelPipelineCoverage is
really quite un-intuitive, you've got to have quite a bit of Netty
knowledge to know what it means.
@Stateful and @Stateless can easily be grasped by users, especially
non-expert non-native english speakers; Michaels concern is dealing
with a special case IMHO (handlers that do store state are much more
often per pipeline then not), this can be covered in the
documentation.

regards,
christian!


On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Trustin Lee (이희승) <trustin at gmail.com> wrote:
> What do you think about replacing ChannelPipelineCoverage with more
> explicit annotations such as @Stateful and @Stateless?
>
> ChannelPipelineCoverage has a confusing name (at least for a
> beginner), and its value cannot be validated on compile time because
> it's string.
>
> — Trustin Lee, http://gleamynode.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> netty-dev mailing list
> netty-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-dev
>