New Feature Request - Connection caching

Trustin Lee tlee at redhat.com
Tue Dec 2 00:09:23 EST 2008


On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:56:58PM +0900, Simon Trudeau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Trustin Lee <tlee at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Could you let me know what is the difference from the message
>> retransmission on TCP or JMS level?  OS TCP stack and JMS already does the
>> job for you in this case, no?
>>
> 
> What I meant by retransmission is just the retry mechanism outlined above
> should a channel get remotely closed by a remote peer.
> 
> The point I wanted to raise was the concurrency issue with doing a "connect"
> operation from multiple threads to the same remote peer which only allows
> for a limited number of connections. Connections need to be obtained from
> the pool and the connection attempt needs to be synchronized against some
> global object.

Now I got your point.  Let me keep this in the to-do list.

Thanks for the feed back!
 
-- 
Trustin Lee, Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, a division of Red Hat
--
what we call human nature in actuality is human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/netty-users/attachments/20081202/f39b825d/attachment.bin 


More information about the netty-users mailing list