New Feature Request - State Machine

[Rafael Marins]

Anyway, I just thought it is possible to use mina-statemachine component
together with classes extending from SimpleChannelHandler, as it's an
independent module. As simple as Netty users can mix both artifacts (netty
and mina-statemachine) together in their projects.

I'll try to use the statemachine in my next protocol-handler.



Trustin Lee-2 wrote:
> 
> That's the cool state machine implementation by Niklas, right?  :D
> 
> I'd love to import it into Netty codebase, too!  What I'd like to do is
> to analyse the issues with Niklas's current implementation and write it
> from scratch to avoid possible copyright issues (I don't want to be
> bothered by some people I don't want to interact.)  It would be great to
> get some help from Niklas, but it seemed like he's quite busy these days
> unfortunately.
> 
> So, please keep us updated with your requirements on the state machine -
> what could be improved and what could be fixed.
> 
> Cheers,
> Trustin
> 
> -- 
> Trustin Lee, Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> --
> what we call human nature in actuality is human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> netty-users mailing list
> netty-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-users
> 
> 


-----
Rafael Marins
Neociclo - http://www.neociclo.com


-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/New-Feature-Request---State-Machine-tp1563216p3427770.html
Sent from the Netty User Group mailing list archive at Nabble.com.