web sockets support

[mheath]

That was my impression as well.  I'm hoping to have the time later this 
week to build a test Web Socket server using Netty.

-Mike

Iain McGinniss [via Netty Forums and Mailing Lists] wrote:
> >From the cursory look I had at the web sockets spec a few months 
> back, this should not be too difficult either. The functionality could 
> be provided as a codec that does the initial HTTP negotiation (with 
> proxy support) and then removes / disables itself and it's helpers 
> once the raw TCP mode is active.
>
> Iain
>
> On 10 Dec 2009, at 21:33, Adam Fisk wrote:
>
> > Just wanted to mention web sockets support in Netty would be *sick*. I
> > think web sockets are going to gain momentum very quickly.
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> > --
> > Adam Fisk
> > http://www.littleshoot.org | http://adamfisk.wordpress.com |
> > http://twitter.com/adamfisk
> > _______________________________________________
> > netty-users mailing list
> > [hidden email] 
> <http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4165578&i=0>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netty-users mailing list
> [hidden email] 
> <http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4165578&i=1>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-users
>
>
> View message @ 
> http://n2.nabble.com/web-sockets-support-tp4148032p4165578.html
> To unsubscribe from Netty Forums and Mailing Lists, click here 
> < (link removed) =>. 
>
>


-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/web-sockets-support-tp4148032p4165771.html
Sent from the Netty User Group mailing list archive at Nabble.com.