http tunnel not as servlet
miarkus at tlen.pl
miarkus at tlen.pl
Sat Nov 21 05:45:26 EST 2009
Hi Adam,
I'll def take a look at your LittleProxy. Still I'd appreciate some help
with netty's native support for tunnelling and having this feature build-in
into server apart from having it as deployed as servlet.
Best,
Pete
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Fisk" <a at littleshoot.org>
To: "Netty Users" <netty-users at lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: http tunnel not as servlet
> LittleProxy supports tunneling. It's still in its infancy, but it's
> been working well in our tests:
>
> http://dev.littleshoot.org:8084/display/proxy/LittleShoot+Java+HTTP+Proxy+-+LittleProxy
>
> -Adam
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:24 PM, miarkus <miarkus at tlen.pl> wrote:
>>
>> Please advise me what steps should I take to have http tunnel built-in
>> into
>> NETTY server, so it won't have to run as servlet.
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/http-tunnel-not-as-servlet-tp4021041p4021041.html
>> Sent from the Netty User Group mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> netty-users mailing list
>> netty-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Adam Fisk
> http://www.littleshoot.org | http://adamfisk.wordpress.com |
> http://twitter.com/adamfisk
> _______________________________________________
> netty-users mailing list
> netty-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-users
More information about the netty-users
mailing list