Improve http performance?

[Jiming Liu]

Hi Tee,

Keep-alive is ok. But in a lot of situation, we can not use keep-alive.

I will try to read your code and to see whether I could contribute some
code:)

Thanks,

Jiming

>Hi Jiming,
>
>In non-keepalive connections, most time is spent on establishing and
>closing connections, so I don't think there will be much difference in
>performance.
>
>In keepalive connections, Netty is much faster than Tomcat according to
>your test result, although I'm not sure what's your definition of 'much
>faster.'
>
>I think there's enough room for even further performance improvement in
>Netty's HTTP codec as you said though.  Please feel free to post some
>patches if you found some hot spot and got a fix.
>
>Thanks,
>Trustin
>
>Jiming Liu wrote:
>> Hi Tee,
>>
>> I tried to test the performance of Netty(3.2alpha3) and Tomcat, and
>> dispointedly found that Netty is not much faster than tomcat as I
expected.
>>
>> The result is here,
>> http://jiming.javaeye.com/blog/618026
>>
>> Today, I profiled the netty example by JProfiler and found that it is
>> possible to improve the performance.
>> following is partial result of JProfiler, wish could be useful.
>>
谢谢

刘继明
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/netty-users/attachments/20100330/e5017fc0/attachment-0001.html