Websocket draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10

[Vibul Imtarnasan]

Thanks Trustin.

I'll try to pitch in where I can.

Can we have some guidance as to how the changes should to be made?

1. Is the current org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.http.websocket package to be
kept as is for backwards compatibility?

2. If backwards compatibility is required, should we create a new package
called org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.http.websocket10?

Thanks

Regards
Vibul

On 11 August 2011 10:35, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <trustin at gmail.com> wrote:

> We do have a plan to upgrade to the latest draft for sure.   No fixed date
> though.  If you are willing to contribute, that would be great, too.
>
> --
> Trustin Lee <http://gleamynode.net/>
>
> On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 at 9:16 PM, vibul wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that Firefox 7 and Chrome 14 will be supporting
> draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10 (refer to
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebSocket).
>
> Any plans by the Netty team to upgrade websockets to support the new
> version
> of the standard?
>
> I understand that it is still draft but it seems that the major browsers
> are
> converging on this draft.
>
> Thanks
> Vibul
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://netty-forums-and-mailing-lists.685743.n2.nabble.com/Websocket-draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10-tp6672115p6672115.html
> Sent from the Netty User Group mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> netty-users mailing list
> netty-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netty-users mailing list
> netty-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/netty-users/attachments/20110811/3dd57e7a/attachment.html