Websocket draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10

[이희승 (Trustin Lee)]

Hi Oli,

Thanks for trying to help us! I really appreciate that.

I believe the latest draft changed quite a lot from the older ones. Last time I checked, both handshake and frame format were changed. Therefore, the existing handshake code will need a rewrite.

HTH 

-- 
Trustin Lee (http://gleamynode.net/)

On Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 3:18 AM, wool.in.silver wrote:

> Hi Trustin / Vibul,
> 
> I would agree that there is no need to retain support for the older Hixie-76
> version of the protocol, as (for example) Chromium 14 seems to have dropped
> support for that version.
> 
> I can perhaps help with testing any new implementation. My organisation is
> using Netty to develop WebSocket applications; we see that to support
> Chromium 14 (and apparently Firefox 6) we will need code changes. Probably
> we will not support earlier browsers due to security concerns with earlier
> versions of the WebSocket protocol.
> 
> Am I correct to say that both the handshake *and* framing for WebSockets has
> changed in version HyBi-10? Where would changes need to be made to Netty -
> it is confined to the handshake method and the WebSocketFrameDecoder/Encoder
> classes I believe?
> 
> Yours,
> Oli
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://netty-forums-and-mailing-lists.685743.n2.nabble.com/Websocket-draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10-tp6672115p6692350.html
> Sent from the Netty User Group mailing list archive at Nabble.com (http://Nabble.com).
> _______________________________________________
> netty-users mailing list
> netty-users at lists.jboss.org (mailto:netty-users at lists.jboss.org)
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/netty-users/attachments/20110817/bdef40f4/attachment.html