[resteasy-dev] tjws

[Rostislav Svoboda]

Rostislav Svoboda 
Principal JBoss QA Engineer 

----- Original Message -----

> On 06/01/2016 05:20 PM, Alessio Soldano wrote:

> > Il 01/06/2016 20:16, Ron Sigal ha scritto:
> 

> > > > ARQ + Undertow know each other:
> > > > http://arquillian.org/modules/undertow-embedded-container-adapter/
> > > 
> > 
> 

> > > My first inclination, like Weinan's, was to think that running everything
> > > in
> > > Wildfly was pretty heavy, but if we just start Wildfly once, that's not
> > > so
> > > bad.
> > 
> 
> > Right, that's what I meant saying that it depends on how you implement the
> > solution. In practice, we might end up needing more than just a single WFLY
> > instance (perhaps because we need different container configurations for
> > different types of tests), but the number of instances should really be
> > limited (let's say less than 5?).
> 

> > > After all, that's what the TCK does, as well as the new qe TS.
> > 
> 
> > And the JBossWS testsuite ;)
> 

> > > One problem I still have is that, when I'm working on a problem, I MUCH
> > > prefer running tests in an embedded container like tjws or Undertow.
> > 
> 
> > Not sure what the preference is based on, but if that's because you don't
> > want to manually start the container, etc... Arquillian does that for you.
> 

> I just like the instantaneous startup. For example, I just ran a test in
> RESTEASY-TEST-WF8, and it took 2.7 seconds to start up Wildfly and another
> 2.7 seconds to create and deploy the WAR. Better than AS 5 ;-) but still a
> little annoying.

If you do TS properly you need to start WF just once so I don't see this as a problem. 
Starting WF for each test is bad practice. 

R. 

> > > I guess I could just write a standalone test and then turn it into an
> > > arquillian test when I'm done. But if Arquillian works with Undertow,
> > > which
> > > I didn't know, that might be the best of all worlds.
> > 
> 
> > I've never tried this, but afaiu yes it works with Undertow.
> 

> > > I'm a little worried though about the time it takes Arquillian to create
> > > a
> > > WAR, which isn't insignificant ...
> > 
> 

> > It's not that bad after all; btw, once you have all tests as arquillian
> > ones
> > and you ensure they do not make assumptions on the server being there just
> > for each of them (which is also good), you can most likely make the
> > testsuite execution concurrent and run multiple tests at the same time.
> 

> > Cheers
> 
> > Alessio
> 

> > --
> 
> > Alessio Soldano
> 
> > Web Service Lead, JBoss
> 

> > _______________________________________________
> 
> > resteasy-dev mailing list resteasy-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev
> 

> --
> My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)

> _______________________________________________
> resteasy-dev mailing list
> resteasy-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/resteasy-dev/attachments/20160602/8b13c7ae/attachment.html