[resteasy-dev] Remove top jaxrs dir in upstream

[Rebecca Searls]

The structure looks good.

I get a build failure when the tests are run.  Is this expected.
 
mvn clean install

   [INFO] RESTEASY-903-WF8 ................................... FAILURE [  6.727 s]
     Tests in error: 
        org.jboss.resteasy.test.resteasy903.UndertowTest: Cannot deploy: RESTEASY-903.war
        org.jboss.resteasy.test.resteasy903.FilterTest: Cannot deploy: RESTEASY-903.war



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alessio Soldano" <asoldano at redhat.com>
> To: resteasy-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 12:06:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [resteasy-dev] Remove top jaxrs dir in upstream
> 
> The first PR for RESTEASY-1361 is being tested now (passed locally):
> https://github.com/resteasy/Resteasy/pull/808
> It includes removal of the jaxrs dir and pruning of the examples (the jaxrs
> 2.0 samples are still there, tested by default, while other examples have
> been moved to https://github.com/resteasy/resteasy-examples )
> 
> Please have a look, I'd like to have this merged by tomorrow, so that we can
> go on with the build improvements.
> 
> Cheers
> Alessio
> 
> Il 21/05/2016 01:25, Ron Sigal ha scritto:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Got it. Thanks, guys.
> 
> On 05/20/2016 03:36 PM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Il 20/05/2016 19:35, Weinan Li ha scritto:
> 
> 
> 
> - Weinan Li
> 
> 
> 
> On May 21, 2016, at 1:24 AM, Ron Sigal <rsigal at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Two questions.
> 
> 1. jaxrs will continue to exist on the 3.0.x branch, right?
> Right(I guess so).
> Sure
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2. More generally, what exactly goes into branch 3.0.x? I assume just bug
> fixes. Are they just bug fixes that come out of EAP 7? Or do all bug fixes
> have to be applied to both 3.0.x and master?
> IMHO we should fully focus on 3.1.x from now on, and next release goes into
> Wildfly will be 3.1.0.
> Exactly. We might decide to do another 3.0.x release if there's really
> need to (for instance should we figure out 3.0.17.Final has a critical
> issue deserving another community fix release). However the focus should
> now be on 3.1.x.
> 
> Cheers
> Alessio
> 
> 
> 
> For 3.0.x, I guess we should treat it similar like 2.3.x, and only maintain
> it for EAP one-offs and CVE fixes in redhat-resteasy repo.
> 
> 
> 
> -Ron
> 
> On 05/20/2016 05:39 AM, Weinan Li wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Team,
> 
> I'm planning to remove 'jaxrs' top dir next week, which I guess will affect
> all the open PRs, wdyt?
> 
> --
> Weinan Li / JBoss
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resteasy-dev mailing list resteasy-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev
> --
> My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resteasy-dev mailing list resteasy-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev
> _______________________________________________
> resteasy-dev mailing list resteasy-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev
> 
> --
> My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resteasy-dev mailing list resteasy-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev
> 
> 
> --
> Alessio Soldano
> Web Service Lead, JBoss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resteasy-dev mailing list
> resteasy-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev
>