Graphene and Drone dependencies

[Brian Leathem]

I'm ok either way.  By explicitly stating the dependency we have a
chance to override the Graphene transitive dependency. OTOH we haven't
had a requirement yet to do so.

If it makes things easier for QE, then go ahead an consolidate the deps.

Brian

On 14-10-07 11:39 PM, Matej Novotny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while I was going through some test dependencies I found out that RF have the following dependencies:
>
> <version.arquillian.graphene>2.1.0.Alpha1</version.arquillian.graphene>
> <version.arquillian.drone>1.3.1.Final</version.arquillian.drone>
>
> But graphene itself has dependency on drone in exactly the same version. And I presume new versions of Graphene will try to use latest (Final) releases of Drone.
> Same goes for arquillian core.
>
> Is there a reason why we need to declare these dependencies specifically? Could/Should we remove them?
>
> Posted by forums
> Original post: https://developer.jboss.org/message/906306#906306
> _______________________________________________
> richfaces-dev mailing list
> richfaces-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-dev