[richfaces-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (RF-10698) inplaces: rf-* styleing problems

[Nick Belaevski (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-10698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12586962#comment-12586962 ] 

Nick Belaevski commented on RF-10698:
-------------------------------------

Ilya,

How to deal with the following collision:

rf-ii-edit vs rf-ii-edt?

> inplaces: rf-* styleing problems
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RF-10698
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-10698
>             Project: RichFaces
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: component-input
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0.CR1
>            Reporter: Ilya Shaikovsky
>            Assignee: Pavel Yaschenko
>             Fix For: 4.0.0.Final
>
>
> 1) root spans has rf-ii-d-s and rf-is-d-s classes and then in edit state edit classes applied.
> To be consistent with all the other components root class should be rf-ii and rf-is
> 2) d-s e-s and c-s suffixes for states should not be used! We should not abbreviate states and part prefixes to just single letter(it's difficult even for me to remember what could ot mean and the developers will be confused without looking all the time to abbreviation table). Only few common exceptions made and them all are in tables at http://community.jboss.org/wiki/richCSSclassesnamingconvention. (b-body, c-cell, r-row)
> should be renaimed to def-state.  could discuss name but have to rename definitely.
> 3)  after 2) - abbreviations should be put to wiki page.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira