[richfaces-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (RF-12809) Richfaces-related examples should use -with-richfaces BOM

[Brian Leathem (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-12809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761042#comment-12761042 ] 

Brian Leathem commented on RF-12809:
------------------------------------

Why would we do this?  Why not just consume the RichFaces BOM directly?  using [jboss-javaee-6.0-with-richfaces|https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jboss-bom/blob/master/jboss-javaee-6.0-with-richfaces/pom.xml], which imports the richfaces bom and jboss-javaee-6.0 simply adds more confusin IMO.

On top of that, we have yet one more place to manage the version increment, which [jboss-bom-parent|https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jboss-bom/blob/master/pom.xml#L63] currently pins at 4.2.0.Final - a very old release.

I prefer leaving the RichFaces BOM in the examples directly, as it is most clear to those trying to understand the examples.
                
> Richfaces-related examples should use -with-richfaces BOM
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RF-12809
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-12809
>             Project: RichFaces
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: examples
>            Reporter: Tomas Repel
>             Fix For: 4.3.2, 5.0.0.M2
>
>
> There is jboss-javaee-6.0-with-richfaces BOM, I think this should be used instead of richfaces-bom in case that jboss-javaee-6.0 BOM is required as well. This holds for helloworld-rf, kitchensink-rf and richfaces-validation. In case of helloworld-rf it is sufficient the dependencyManagement section to contain only -with-richfaces BOM, the jboss-javaee-6.0 BOM can be removed completely.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira