[richfaces-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (RF-12809) Richfaces-related examples should use -with-richfaces BOM

[Pete Muir (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-12809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761135#comment-12761135 ] 

Pete Muir commented on RF-12809:
--------------------------------

We have a standard set of BOMs for all product components. I understand this may be more confusing for RichFaces users who aren't used to this, but it is a lot more consistent across the whole product line.

It's easy to update the version in the JBoss BOMs, just send a pull request to that project, and we will do a release. The only reason it's old is because no one from the RichFaces team has requested that it is updated :-)

Whilst it may make the example clearer to you, when viewed across all examples, it's more confusing, IMO as its not consistent.
                
> Richfaces-related examples should use -with-richfaces BOM
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RF-12809
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-12809
>             Project: RichFaces
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: examples
>            Reporter: Tomas Repel
>             Fix For: 4.3.2, 5.0.0.M2
>
>
> There is jboss-javaee-6.0-with-richfaces BOM, I think this should be used instead of richfaces-bom in case that jboss-javaee-6.0 BOM is required as well. This holds for helloworld-rf, kitchensink-rf and richfaces-validation. In case of helloworld-rf it is sufficient the dependencyManagement section to contain only -with-richfaces BOM, the jboss-javaee-6.0 BOM can be removed completely.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira