[richfaces-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (RF-13348) pickList - columnClass attribute behaves differently than in RF4

Brian Leathem (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Fri Nov 15 01:10:05 EST 2013


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-13348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923847#comment-12923847 ] 

Brian Leathem commented on RF-13348:
------------------------------------

Good question [~jhuska].  We have a conflict of compatibilities here.  To be compatible with RF 4, or compatible with JSF.  Would you mind raising this for discussion on richfaces-dev?  We'll hash it out there, then come back and update this issue.
                
> pickList - columnClass attribute behaves differently than in RF4
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RF-13348
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-13348
>             Project: RichFaces
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: component-selects
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.0.Alpha2
>            Reporter: Juraj Húska
>
> {{collumnClass}} attribute of {{r:pickList}} behaves in this way in *RF5*:
> Suppose a {{pickList}}, which items consist from _three_ columns.
> * if you set {{collumnClass}} to: {{foo bar}}, then first column has class {{foo}}, the second one {{bar}}
> * if you set it to {{foo, bar}}, then the first column has class {{foo,bar}} - expected
> In *RF4*, it was different though:
> * it worked as {{collumnClass}} for {{dataTable}}. Literally as it is described in VDL doc:
> bq. Assigns one or more space-separated CSS class names to the columns of the table. If the CSS class names are comma-separated, each class will be assigned to a particular column in the order they follow in the attribute. If you have less class names than columns, the class will be applied to every n-fold column where n is the order in which the class is listed in the attribute. If there are more class names than columns, the overflow ones are ignored.
> The way how it worked in RF4 seems more reasonable for me. What is your opinion on this ?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



More information about the richfaces-issues mailing list