[richfaces-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (RF-13533) Port the jQuery noConlfict fixes back to RF 4.3.x

Brian Leathem (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Tue Feb 4 12:42:28 EST 2014


     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-13533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Brian Leathem updated RF-13533:
-------------------------------

    Summary: Port the jQuery noConlfict fixes back to RF 4.3.x  (was: rich:fileUpload doesn't work with jQuery in noConflict mode)

    
> Port the jQuery noConlfict fixes back to RF 4.3.x
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RF-13533
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-13533
>             Project: RichFaces
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: component
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.3.Final, 4.3.5
>         Environment: Tomcat 7, RichFaces 4.2.3.Final, Debian Wheezy x86_64
>            Reporter: Mark Cave-Ayland
>
> Hi all,
> For compatibility with other components used within our application, we manually include a copy of jQuery in noConflict mode within our page header template rather than let RichFaces include its own.
> This works fine for us, except when using the <rich:fileUpload> component which throws a Javascript error. Casual inspection of the source shows that this is due to a typing error where $ is used directly within fileupload.js rather than using the passed-in parameter. The following diff fixes the error for us:
> {code}
> $ diff -u fileupload.js.orig fileupload.js
> --- fileupload.js.orig  2014-02-04 15:07:05.000000000 +0000
> +++ fileupload.js       2014-02-04 15:08:32.000000000 +0000
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
>  
>      richfaces.BaseComponent.extend(richfaces.ui.FileUpload);
>  
> -    $.extend(richfaces.ui.FileUpload.prototype, (function () {
> +    jQuery.extend(richfaces.ui.FileUpload.prototype, (function () {
>  
>          return {
>              name: "FileUpload",
> {code}
> The bug was found during the development of our main application under RF 4.2.3.Final, however a quick test with RF 4.3.5 JARs shows that the bug is still present.
> Many thanks,
> Mark.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


More information about the richfaces-issues mailing list