[richfaces-planning-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (RFPL-1039) split metamer-ftest--server-compatibility into different builds

Lukas Fryc (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Jan 3 10:44:17 EST 2011


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RFPL-1039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572686#comment-12572686 ] 

Lukas Fryc commented on RFPL-1039:
----------------------------------

Separating by runtimes will not shorten the time of execution.

The better idea is separate it to several jobs by the component groups like: "a4j-core / iteration / misc / etc."


Then we can create:

richfaces-4.0-metamer-ftest--a4j-core
richfaces-4.0-metamer-ftest--iteration (we can omit server-compatibility since we have no other <xyz>-compatibility jobs)

Pros: good separation, each group can be scheduled specifically to another day to decrease Hudson peaking
Cons: several more jobs (about 6-7 groups?)

> split metamer-ftest--server-compatibility into different builds
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RFPL-1039
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RFPL-1039
>             Project: RichFaces Planning
>          Issue Type: Task
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0.Milestone4
>            Reporter: Prabhat Jha
>            Assignee: Pavol Pitonak
>             Fix For: 4.0.0.CR1
>
>
> Currently, we have following matrix builds:
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/RF-4.0/job/richfaces-4.0-metamer-ftest--server-compatibility/
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/RF-Rel/job/richfaces-4.0-release-metamer-ftest--server-compatibility/
> These builds take on average more than 5 hours which is not a good thing. These need to be split into separate  matrix builds. I am thinking
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/RF-4.0/job/richfaces-4.0-metamer-ftest--jboss6-compatibility/
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/RF-4.0/job/richfaces-4.0-metamer-ftest--tomcat6-compatibility/
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/RF-Rel/job/richfaces-4.0-release-metamer-ftest--jboss6-comp
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/RF-Rel/job/richfaces-4.0-release-metamer-ftest--tomcat6-comp
> So basically have one matrix build for each run time and each build will run with Mojarra, myfaces. I am open to other ideas. Just to clarify, this jira is in addition to https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RFPL-941 which is about consolidating template and tests otherwise we have lots of redundant tests.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the richfaces-planning-issues mailing list