[rules-dev] quick design questions to mull over - regarding the repo

Michael Neale michael.neale at gmail.com
Sat Feb 3 18:33:55 EST 2007


Hi Felipe - can you send me the files directly? seem to be stripped off.

Transparent popups generally mean that the CSS for the popup isn't sticking
for some reason - should be easy to resolve with some experimentation.

Felipe - you were a contributor to drools 2.x right? as in, you had CVS
access etc?

Michael (sans macbook pro :( )

On 2/3/07, Felipe Piccolini <felipe.piccolini at bluesoft.cl> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>    Yes, im using GWT 1.2.
>
>    And yes, all pop-up windows looks transparents and some frames dont
> looks good.
>
>   Im using Firefox (2.0, but was the same with 1.5) and I will check the
> CSS file.
>
>   Im using a MacBook Pro, OS X 1.4, Eclipse 3.2 (last release) and
> JBossRules 3.0.5 and
> for the jbossrules-jbrms Im using the SVN sources with the JBRMS-compiler
> and launcher
> modified (not much, just some paths).
>
>  I attached this 2 files so u can see them. If I get any results messing
> with the CSS I will tell u.
>
>   Thanks.
>
>   Great work BTW!
>
> On 01-02-2007, at 21:28, Michael Neale wrote:
>
> Hi Felipe - are you using the GWT bit?
>
> I assume you mean the popup windows look bad?
>
> GWT normally does a really good job cross browser - are you safari or
> firefox?
> Basically, what you are saying sounds like it is the CSS screwing up - so
> if you track down the CSS that sets that up you may be able to change.
> Also, with EditCSS in Firefox 1.5 or 2, you can browse and change the CSS
> onscreen in real time.
>
> Can you share what you have done? is it generic enough?
>
> Michael.
>
>
> On 2/2/07, Felipe Piccolini <felipe.piccolini at bluesoft.cl> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >   Iv been following your work in the brms/repository very closely
> > because Im working in something very similar by
> > my self for a project using JBossRules, and as I cant wait much longer I
> > decided to use your work as a base to
> > put something on production until you guys do the "real-cool" thing.
> >
> >   About your questions, IMHO,
> > -Q1: I think dsl should be an attribute (as far as I know, you can put
> > only 1 dsl expander on drl files) and
> > there should be only one reference to expand the rule sentences, if you
> > have multiple dsl, then have mutiple drl (packages).
> > -Q2: I think object models (or business models to use as facts for your
> > rules) should be assets, so u can organize your model/classes
> > not thinking in drools or any other framework, so you can extend your
> > model or rules with just a pointer as a dependency, just as you
> > can put or remove jars from your classpath.
> >
> >  One thing I wanted to tell you for some time about drools-brms is that
> > for some reason I dont know, the gwt ui looks awfull on mac (OS X),
> > I made it works changing some things on the .launcher and .shell files,
> > but its looks like no modal window has a background, or complete
> > messed up.. can you check it out? or help me to guiding me what to check
> > to see it right? Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On 01-02-2007, at 3:23, Michael Neale wrote:
> >
> > BUT this also applies to the file structure for "packages" in a file
> > system/IDE (forget monolothic DRL for a moment - but instead imagine a
> > folder which is a rule package containing lots of rules).
> >
> > (in no particular order);
> >
> > Q1: Should DSL "language configurations" be stored as an "asset" inside
> > a package (ie a file, perhaps multiple ones of them?) - or are they an
> > attribute of a package?
> > Q2: The object model: should this be stored as an attribute of a package
> > - or just another asset of which there can be muliple ones uploaded (as a
> > jar, for instance).
> > This is needed for validation/tooling. Obviously in the IDE the classes
> > will be on the classpath, but in the repo they have to be stored somewhere.
> >
> > Note versioning works well in all scenarios (subtle differences between
> > a package attribute and asset for versioning, but ignore them for now).
> >
> > I have opinions, but wanted some discussion (attachment screenshot shows
> > the package managment screen).
> > <Screenshot-JBoss Business Rules Management System .png>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >  * Felipe Piccolini M.*
> > felipe.piccolini at bluesoft.cl
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>                                                                         *Felipe
> Piccolini M.*
> felipe.piccolini at bluesoft.cl
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20070204/ddda3e30/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-dev mailing list