[rules-dev] Re: [drools-dev] 3.2 M1

[Peter Lin]

haha, users already do the right thing :)

so no one ever needs to worry about a rule being 5 pages with deeply nested
and/or.  Joking aside, I am quite shocked at how frequent users do it. In
fact, I would say it's like half the time, users do stupid things like that.

then they bring in a consultant, who fixes the pile of mess.

peter

On 1/13/07, Michael Neale <michael.neale at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> yes, well just cause you can, doesn't mean you should... ;)
>
> I think its needed for the first order logic stuff like not, exists,
> forall, *occasionally* (especially "not" I have often wanted it), but should
> only be used as a light seasoning.
>
> On 1/12/07, Peter Lin <woolfel at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > oh the horror of users nesting statements 4-10 deep.
> >
> > I fear the poor user won't know what the heck they wrote the next day :)
> >
> > peter
> >
> > On 1/12/07, Edson Tirelli < tirelli at post.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >    Except for the need to change code target to 1.5, core and compiler
> > > are compiling fine now and all tests are green.
> > >
> > >    I just commited the new Builders. We now support any level of
> > > Conditional Elements nesting.
> > >
> > >    Forall is just syntax sugar that I will add now. Shall be ok on
> > > monday.
> > >
> > >    So, I think the major requirement for M1 is the MVEL stuff.
> > >
> > >    []s
> > >    Edson
> > >
> > > Michael Neale wrote:
> > >
> > > > lol ! other then 3.0.x branch ?? ;)
> > > >
> > > > Edson may know a branch to use, but in any case, Mark is beavering
> > > > away on MVEL integration which will be awesome (I think he wants
> > > MVEL
> > > > for an M1 release).
> > > >
> > > > On 1/12/07, *Dirk Bergstrom* < dirk at juniper.net
> > > > <mailto: dirk at juniper.net>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >     Michael Neale was heard to exclaim, On 01/02/07 05:28:
> > > >     > Guys, I am ok to do a M1 release of 3.2  whenever needed
> > > >
> > > >     Any news on this?  I've been running (in production now) on code
> > > I
> > > >     pulled from
> > > >     trunk a month or so ago, and it throws NPEs now and again.  I'd
> > > >     really like to
> > > >     get something a bit more stable.  Today's trunk "revision 8842"
> > > >     doesn't build,
> > > >     because the mvel code is Java 1.5.
> > > >
> > > >     I'm kinda stuck here, and I'm hoping that someone can throw me a
> > >
> > > >     bone.  If M1
> > > >     isn't coming soon, was there a particular revision number that
> > > was
> > > >     fairly stable
> > > >     that I can use?
> > > >
> > > >     --
> > > >     Dirk Bergstrom               dirk at juniper.net
> > > >     <mailto: dirk at juniper.net>
> > > >     _____________________________________________
> > > >     Juniper Networks Inc.,          Computer Geek
> > > >     Tel: 408.745.3182           Fax: 408.745.8905
> > > >     _______________________________________________
> > > >     rules-users mailing list
> > > >     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> > > >     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >rules-dev mailing list
> > > > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Edson Tirelli
> > > Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
> > > Office: +55 11 3124-6000
> > > Mobile: +55 11 9218-4151
> > > JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rules-dev mailing list
> > > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20070113/5889a596/attachment.html