[rules-dev] Re: [drools-dev] 3.2 M1
Felipe Piccolini
felipe.piccolini at bluesoft.cl
Mon Jan 15 06:19:24 EST 2007
I could recomend a good portion of explained documentation and
examples... sometimes its all an user need
to not mess it.
:)
On 13-01-2007, at 18:49, Michael Neale wrote:
> It is more common, hopefully over time education and tooling will
> make it clearer of the benefits of "the right way", but there seems
> to be a law that says turing complete environments/languages will
> be used for ANYTHING (and its true from my experience).
>
> On 1/13/07, Peter Lin <woolfel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> haha, users already do the right thing :)
>
> so no one ever needs to worry about a rule being 5 pages with
> deeply nested and/or. Joking aside, I am quite shocked at how
> frequent users do it. In fact, I would say it's like half the time,
> users do stupid things like that.
>
> then they bring in a consultant, who fixes the pile of mess.
>
> peter
>
>
> On 1/13/07, Michael Neale < michael.neale at gmail.com> wrote:
> yes, well just cause you can, doesn't mean you should... ;)
>
> I think its needed for the first order logic stuff like not,
> exists, forall, *occasionally* (especially "not" I have often
> wanted it), but should only be used as a light seasoning.
>
>
> On 1/12/07, Peter Lin < woolfel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> oh the horror of users nesting statements 4-10 deep.
>
> I fear the poor user won't know what the heck they wrote the next
> day :)
>
> peter
>
>
> On 1/12/07, Edson Tirelli < tirelli at post.com> wrote:
> Except for the need to change code target to 1.5, core and compiler
> are compiling fine now and all tests are green.
>
> I just commited the new Builders. We now support any level of
> Conditional Elements nesting.
>
> Forall is just syntax sugar that I will add now. Shall be ok on
> monday.
>
> So, I think the major requirement for M1 is the MVEL stuff.
>
> []s
> Edson
>
> Michael Neale wrote:
>
> > lol ! other then 3.0.x branch ?? ;)
> >
> > Edson may know a branch to use, but in any case, Mark is beavering
> > away on MVEL integration which will be awesome (I think he wants
> MVEL
> > for an M1 release).
> >
> > On 1/12/07, *Dirk Bergstrom* < dirk at juniper.net
> > <mailto: dirk at juniper.net>> wrote:
> >
> > Michael Neale was heard to exclaim, On 01/02/07 05:28:
> > > Guys, I am ok to do a M1 release of 3.2 whenever needed
> >
> > Any news on this? I've been running (in production now) on
> code I
> > pulled from
> > trunk a month or so ago, and it throws NPEs now and again. I'd
> > really like to
> > get something a bit more stable. Today's trunk "revision 8842"
> > doesn't build,
> > because the mvel code is Java 1.5.
> >
> > I'm kinda stuck here, and I'm hoping that someone can throw me a
> > bone. If M1
> > isn't coming soon, was there a particular revision number
> that was
> > fairly stable
> > that I can use?
> >
> > --
> > Dirk Bergstrom dirk at juniper.net
> > <mailto: dirk at juniper.net>
> > _____________________________________________
> > Juniper Networks Inc., Computer Geek
> > Tel: 408.745.3182 Fax: 408.745.8905
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Edson Tirelli
> Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
> Office: +55 11 3124-6000
> Mobile: +55 11 9218-4151
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
Felipe Piccolini M.
felipe.piccolini at bluesoft.cl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20070115/4d428ed1/attachment.html
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list