[rules-dev] Conway example - update to use ruleflow

[Michael Neale]

Hi Michael.

I think Mark was working on a "stateful" conways example (the old was
stateless) - I wasn't sure if he got to using ruleflow (just check first).

Ruleflow is probably very useful to most people who would have used
agenda-groups - agenda-groups are a stack, which is not intuitive to most
people, but ruleflows are more imperative, so examples showing that are
appreciated. I would almost go as far as to say that *most* of the time when
you want control, you want ruleflow (you will know if you want agenda).
Correct me if I am wrong, ruleflow is new to me !

Michael.

On 5/16/07, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1 at ford.com> wrote:
>
>  Just to let you know I am updating the example to use ruleflow (it looks
> like one or more rules are wrong too as the "glider" doesn't glide, so I'll
> have a look at these also).
>
> Doesn't look particularly taxing so should have it done very soon -
> provided the wife doesn't complain that she's not seeing much of me in the
> evenings ;-)
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20070518/07c8a639/attachment.html