[rules-dev] drools-spring and drools-guice

[Barry Kaplan]

Mark Proctor wrote:
> 
> Ultimiately the integration should be quite lightweight - mostly about 
> creating rulebases and working memory and probably the scoping and 
> caching of these. I guess you could also have some life cycle management 
> about objects themselves and auto assertion/retraction to named working 
> memories. 
> 

Sorry for the late entry Mark. If this the desired scope, the work I did for
2.0 is probably highly relevant. It had factory beans for creating WM and
such. Is that code checked into the jboss version of the repository?

-barry

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/drools-spring-and-drools-guice-tp14795239p16810831.html
Sent from the drools - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.