[rules-dev] drools-spring and drools-guice
Mark Proctor
mproctor at codehaus.org
Mon Jan 14 18:17:02 EST 2008
Paul Browne wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I've already a bit of code that does simple Spring Integration (and am
> clear to donate it to Drools, need to change it to LGPL). Not sure
> what you'll think of the quality (!) but already used on a client
> site, might be a useful starting point.
>
Can we get it ASL, instead of LGPL? Xavier was on irc today, I think
he's going to have a crack at it too. So keep an eye out for him. Make
sure you read over Ales ideas that he implemented for the JBoss MC, many
of them are applicable.
> http://red-piranha.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/red-piranha/trunk/rp-core/src/main/java/net/fp/rp/drools/SpringDecisionTableLoader.java?revision=7&view=markup
>
>
> Paul
>
> Mark Proctor wrote:
>> I'd like to add two sub projects to Drools to enable better spring
>> and guice support - especially now we have the RuleAgent. Any
>> volunteers for this? I'd like to try and standardise, as much as
>> possible, how Drools works and integrates with IoC containers.
>>
>> Ultimiately the integration should be quite lightweight - mostly
>> about creating rulebases and working memory and probably the scoping
>> and caching of these. I guess you could also have some life cycle
>> management about objects themselves and auto assertion/retraction to
>> named working memories. We'd need to define a set of agreed
>> annotations to define these things, that would work across
>> containers. I believe the JBoss MC people have done some work in this
>> area, I have cc'd to see if they have any input or documentation
>> pointers.
>>
>> The core dev team don't have the time and aren't spring/guice
>> specialists - so anyone willing to take this up? If we can get
>> reasonable implementations we will add them to subversion (and the
>> authors commit rights), and make part of the next release - assuming
>> they are of good enough quality.
>>
>> So any takers, maybe we could atleast start at defining what this
>> level of integration should look like?
>>
>> Mark
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list