[rules-dev] RE: [rules-users] Compatibility of Rule Flows from 4.0.7 to 5.0.0

Mark Proctor mproctor at codehaus.org
Fri Oct 31 07:55:11 EDT 2008


Nimesh Muley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> Yes the patch detects which version and upgrades on the fly 
> (Abrakadabra magic ;-)).
>
oh right, cool I'll check this out. I've been on conference for the last 
3 weeks, so I've got behind on looking at JIRAs, so if it's magic then I 
should be able to just include it.
>
>  
>
> There is a system parameter ("drools.ruleflow.port"). The code checks 
> for version only when the system parameter is set to true. This was 
> added so that there is no overhead (CPU time) for users who are using 
> rule flows in 5.0 only. Users using the old rule flows in 5.0 and want 
> upgrade must set this parameter to "true".
>
>  
>
> Main file to be checked for changes is 
> src/main/java/org/drools/compiler/ProcessBuilder.java. The other files 
> are related to cleanup (format as well as code) or test cases.
>
>  
>
> Modifying ProcessBuilder was easier / cleaner to control the upgrade 
> of rule flows instead of ProcessReader. If you feel otherwise then let 
> me know and I will modify it.
>
>  
>
> If you feel more test cases should be added to make this more sturdy 
> then let me know which ones and I can submit the same too.
>
Don't know how many test cases you have, but more is always good, 
especially on something with so many different possabilities. Especially 
for handling bad XML gracefully.
>
>  
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Nimesh
>
>  
>
> *From:* rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org 
> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark Proctor
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 30, 2008 7:47 PM
> *To:* Rules Dev List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] RE: [rules-users] Compatibility of Rule 
> Flows from 4.0.7 to 5.0.0
>
>  
>
> Nimesh Muley wrote:
>
> Oh ok. I developed it because you mentioned whether it would be 
> possible to plug it in package reader.
>
>  
>
> I think we can close this JIRA as invalid.
>
> The code handles the migration right, does it already hook into the 
> package reader? I wasn't sure, as i haven't read the code yet. Are you 
> saying the patch will detect which version of the XML it is, and 
> upgrade on the fly?
>
> My assumption was that it was just some code to migrate from 4 to 5, 
> but someone still needs to execute that, so it seemed the easiest 
> route was to do this via an eclipse option for now - as hooking into 
> packagebuilder with auto detection was more work and needed more 
> testing, but if you have done this already....
>
>  
>
> In case there is a change of mind later on we already have a patch for 
> it ;-).
>
> see above.
>
>  
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Nimesh
>
>  
>
> *From:* rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org 
> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org> 
> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark Proctor
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 30, 2008 5:10 PM
> *To:* Rules Dev List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] RE: [rules-users] Compatibility of Rule 
> Flows from 4.0.7 to 5.0.0
>
>  
>
> Nimesh Muley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> I have raised a feature request for this 
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1797 and also submitted a 
> patch (JBRULES-1797.patch.zip) for the same. If there are any changes 
> in the patch kindly let me know.
>
> I believe kris is going to add a feature to eclipse where you can 
> select a ruleflow for it to convert, don't think we are going to go 
> for auto-detection and conversion on the fly with the packagebuilder.
>
> Mark
>
>
>  
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Nimesh
>
>  
>
> *From:* rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org 
> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org> 
> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Nimesh Muley
> *Sent:* Monday, October 06, 2008 10:08 AM
> *To:* 'rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>'
> *Subject:* [rules-dev] RE: [rules-users] Compatibility of Rule Flows 
> from 4.0.7 to 5.0.0
>
>  
>
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> By going through the code it seems possible to achieve this by 
> modifying ProcessBuilder.addProcessFromFile. Easiest check would be to 
> see whether the XML contains element called as "process". Since XML 
> Parsing is internal to the individual releases (4.0 uses XStream and 
> 5.0 uses XMLReader), I am not sure whether we should form a XML 
> document from the reader to check if the process belongs to version 
> 4.0 or compliant.
>
>  
>
> Brute force check would be indexOf ("<process") >= 0 then it is 5.0 
> else 4.0 ;-). I am sure there would be better ways than this kind of 
> check.
>
>  
>
> I do not mind taking this further. Due to lack of in depth knowledge 
> about drools, I am not able to decide what the approach should be for 
> checking the version.
>
>  
>
> This would be a really good feature as it would mean that drools 5.0 
> is backward compliant for rule flows J. And this adds lot of 
> confidence to enterprises.
>
>  
>
> p.s. Since this was now moving towards dev, I have moved the thread to 
> the dev mailing list.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Nimesh
>
>  
>
> *From:* rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org 
> <mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org> 
> [mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark Proctor
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 04, 2008 9:37 PM
> *To:* Rules Users List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Compatibility of Rule Flows from 4.0.7 to 
> 5.0.0
>
>  
>
> You are a star, that saves us a lot of work :) I'm wondering if we can 
> work this into the package reader and some how have it detect whether 
> something is version 4 or 5 and convert first if it's 4, fancy having 
> a look and seeing if that's possible?
>
> Mark
>
> Nimesh Muley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> I have attached a file for translating rule flows from 4.0 to 5.0. I 
> have tested my flows with the XSL and it works fine. However, the XSLT 
> may not be quite slick or compact as I have touched upon XSLT after a 
> long time. I have covered all the nodes available (ruleSet, start, 
> end, join, split, milestone, action and subProcess).
>
>  
>
> There is one issue in the XSLT. I have not added the xmlns attribute 
> to the process element. Reason is that this attribute appears in child 
> nodes too with empty string, even though it is not mentioned for the 
> child nodes. This attribute is needed in the 'process' node because 
> the Eclipse editor for 5.0 ignores the process node if there are more 
> than 2 sub processes in that ruleflow. Am not sure why this is 
> happening but that has been my observation.
>
>  
>
> In case XSLT is not present as an attachment then let me know the 
> location where it can be uploaded.
>
>  
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Nimesh
>
>  
>
> *From:* rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org 
> <mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org> 
> [mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark Proctor
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2008 7:26 PM
> *To:* Rules Users List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Compatibility of Rule Flows from 4.0.7 to 
> 5.0.0
>
>  
>
> No they are not compatible, 5.0 has a new ePDL XML language that is 
> human writable. I suggest that somone in the community starts looking 
> into an XSLT to translate them.
>
> Mark
> Vikrant Yagnick wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>  
>
> I wanted to know if RuleFlows made using the Eclipse 4.0.7 RuleFlow 
> Builder will work with 5.0.0.  When, I try to upload a 4.0.7 ruleflow 
> into Guvnor, I get a NullPointerException and before that the following:
>
>  
>
> Cannot find the declaration of element 
> 'org.drools.ruleflow.core.impl.RuleFlowProcessImpl'.
>
>  
>
> I checked the 5.0.0M1 jars for drools-core, and this class seems to 
> have been removed from there. Also, after installing the 5.0.0 plug-in 
> into Eclipse, my rule-flow nodes have all gone.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Also, this may be a minor bug but it says(both in the docs and the 
> BRMS Guvnor M1 Release):
>
> "/Ruleflows allow flow control between rules. The eclipse plugin 
> provides a graphical editor. Upload /*/_ruleflow .rf_/*/ files for 
> inclusion in this package./":
>
>  
>
> Should the .rf say .rfm ?
>
>  
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vikrant
>
>  
>
>
> MASTEK LTD.
> Mastek is in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
> In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended  
> recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>   
>  
>  
>   
>  
>  
>   
>  
>  
>  
>  
>   
>  
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>   
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
> MASTEK LTD.
> Mastek is in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
> In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended  
> recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>   
>  
>  
>   
>  
>  
>   
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
> MASTEK LTD.
> Mastek is in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
> In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended  
> recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
> MASTEK LTD.
> Mastek is in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
> In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended  
> recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>  
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>   
>  
>  
>   
>  
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>   
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
> MASTEK LTD.
> Mastek is in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
> In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended  
> recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>   
>  
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>   
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
> MASTEK LTD.
> Mastek is in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
> In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20081031/38a6fc15/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-dev mailing list