[rules-dev] Drools ReteOO versus Rete

[Mark Proctor]

Yes none of that is relevant any more.

Mark
Edson Tirelli wrote:
>
>     James,
>
>     I believe this was related to Drools 2.
>     What exactly is your problem?
>
>     []s
>     Edson
>
> 2009/8/14 James Owen <jco2009 at att.net <mailto:jco2009 at att.net>>
>
>     Greetings:
>
>     Just wondering if this link still applies.  If so, I think I may
>     have found an answer to one of my benchmark problems.
>
>     http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DROOLS/Rete+Vs+Reteoo
>
>     SDG
>     James Owen
>     Founder October Rules Fest
>     Senior Consultant / Architect KBSC
>     http://www.kbsc.com
>     http://www.OctoberRulesFest.org
>     Twitter: OctRulesFest
>     Blogs:
>     http://JavaRules.blogspot.com [Rulebased Systems Blog]
>     http://ORF2009.blogspot.com [October Rules Fest Blog]
>     http://exscg.blogspot.com/ [Expert Systems Consulting Group Blog]
>
>     /"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the
>     shoulders of giants."/
>     *Sir Isaac Newton in a letter to Robert Hooke, 5 Feb 1676*
>     *
>     *
>     *Come to October Rules Fest and stand on the shoulders of the
>     Giants of the industry; if only for a week.*
>
>
>
>     On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:21 AM, mrhoden at franklinamerican.com
>     <mailto:mrhoden at franklinamerican.com> wrote:
>
>>     Depending on your number of rules and facts, that amount of memory  
>>     will likely be a concern. If I had memory requirements like that I  
>>     would honestly look a clips.
>>
>>     -Michael
>>
>>     On Aug 13, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Thomas Frenken
>>     <Thomas.Frenken at offis.de <mailto:Thomas.Frenken at offis.de>>  
>>     wrote:
>>
>>>     Hello,
>>>
>>>     I am interested in running Drools 5 (and especially Drools Fusion)  
>>>     on a
>>>>>     somehow<< resource-constrained device for which only a J2SE
>>>>>     1.4 VM  
>>>>>     ist
>>>     available.
>>>
>>>     Since Drools meanwhile requires J2SE 1.5 I thought about
>>>     backporting  
>>>     it.
>>>     But before I invest so much effort, I got two questions:
>>>
>>>     1) I have downloaded the sourcecode. At a first glance the only  
>>>     reason for
>>>     requiering J2SE 1.5 is the extensive use of generics. In case I
>>>     would
>>>     remove all generics from the code, would it be possible to compile  
>>>     drools
>>>     for a J2SE 1.4 VM runtime in general or are there other more hidden
>>>     reasons for requiering J2SE 1.5?
>>>     2)  I already meantioned I am planning to run drools on a
>>>     >>somehow<<
>>>     resourcen-constrained device. I explicitly used the term >>somehow<<
>>>     because I am talking of a device with a 400 Mhz CPU and 256 MB RAM  
>>>     (some
>>>     people might laugh about calling this resource-constrained). How
>>>     about
>>>     resource-consumption of drools? Has anyone run drools on a
>>>     device with
>>>     similar resources?
>>>
>>>     Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>>     Best Regards
>>>     Thomas Frenken
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     rules-dev mailing list
>>>     rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     rules-dev mailing list
>>     rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rules-dev mailing list
>     rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>  Edson Tirelli
>  JBoss Drools Core Development
>  JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com <http://www.jboss.com>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20090814/666e07b4/attachment.html