[rules-dev] osgi packaging
Mark Proctor
mproctor at codehaus.org
Tue Oct 27 00:50:49 EDT 2009
Richard L. Burton III wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> What's the best way to send over the changes I made for the POMs? I
> won't be able to send them over this week, since I'm not near the
> computer which has the pom files.
>
> I should be able to send them over by Friday.
Just create a jira and attach it, diff or zip or both is fine. How did
the work go on the OSGi services, classloaders etc?
Mark
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org
> <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
> Richard Burton (in cc) was looking into this, I believe he was
> getting a basic automated maven build going, and making our api
> more OSGi friendly. I'm not sure on his status.
>
> Mark
> Michael Neale wrote:
>> I see no reason why not - the only effect would be in the manifest of
>> the released jars right?
>>
>> Are you volunteering to look into how to get maven to do this? ;)
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Maciej Prochniak <mpr at touk.pl> <mailto:mpr at touk.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> is OSGI packaging of Jboss rules artifacts planned?
>>> Currently drools bundles are provided by various 3rd parties e.g.
>>> servicemix, springsource
>>> but it would be nice to have 'official' bundles of latest versions with
>>> e.g. correct optional import
>>>
>>> It shouldn't be hard to do, as maven is used in building process - just
>>> a matter of maven-bundle-plugin configuration.
>>>
>>> br,
>>> maciek
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> -Richard L. Burton III
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20091027/3a9e9851/attachment.html
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list