[rules-dev] Evaluation of Drool Rule Engine with Drools Flow

[Michael Neale]

This would be better for the user list I think - other users could
provide advice - this list is for developers on the tool itself.

Thanks,

Michael.

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:05 PM, premkumar<premkumar.sivanandan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>     We are evaluating the Drools Rule engine with Drools flow as work flow
> in web based j2ee project.  The following are important criteria
>
> 1) Customize Rules and Workflow through Web UI
> 2) Admin user can see all of the items in workflow in UI (View job queue:
> current queue, executed jobs, exceptions)
> 3) Integrate with Calendaring/Scheduling
> 4) Versioning of process definitions
> 5) Ability to migrate process instances between process versions
> 6) Rule Actions can be web services
> 7) Web Service can be rule input
> 8) Web service can be actor in process
> 9) Delete/cancel process definitions at runtime
> 10) Conditional elements nesting
> 11) Control steps should allow parallel flows within steps for synchronizing
> of joining parallel flows
> 12) process simulation
>
> Please can any one provide your inputs on the above mentioned areas to help
> us this evaluation process.
>
> Thanks
> Prem
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Evaluation-of-Drool-Rule-Engine-with-Drools-Flow-tp25238368p25238368.html
> Sent from the drools - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>



-- 
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com