[rules-dev] Drools + Spring

Mark Proctor mproctor at codehaus.org
Fri Apr 9 14:32:35 EDT 2010


On 09/04/2010 17:52, fxleonardo wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thank you for your prompt response. You've mentioned that we can't get the
> same richness of using Java instead of DRL. I'm a bit confused, I thought
> the drl's are eventually compiled to Java code eventually.
>    
The consequences are compiled to java, the LHS is still an interpretted 
network.

We plan to compiled the whole thing down to java eventually, for 
performance gains
> I guess the reason why I was going for Java solution was because I would
> like to save the conversion time from drt ->  drl ->  java(?).
>    
Us compiling DRL down to java, is not the same as offering human 
authorable java - I believe it's the later you are after?

Mark
> Thanks again!
>    




More information about the rules-dev mailing list