[rules-dev] Drools + Spring
Mark Proctor
mproctor at codehaus.org
Fri Apr 9 14:32:35 EDT 2010
On 09/04/2010 17:52, fxleonardo wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thank you for your prompt response. You've mentioned that we can't get the
> same richness of using Java instead of DRL. I'm a bit confused, I thought
> the drl's are eventually compiled to Java code eventually.
>
The consequences are compiled to java, the LHS is still an interpretted
network.
We plan to compiled the whole thing down to java eventually, for
performance gains
> I guess the reason why I was going for Java solution was because I would
> like to save the conversion time from drt -> drl -> java(?).
>
Us compiling DRL down to java, is not the same as offering human
authorable java - I believe it's the later you are after?
Mark
> Thanks again!
>
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list