[rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war fileis nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?

Anstis, Michael (M.) manstis1 at ford.com
Thu Aug 5 08:32:37 EDT 2010


It's something I understand - think how dangerous I'd be with knowledge
;-)
 
Not quite the same calibre as Wolfgang and his comments on Slot Specific
and Refraction... yet.


________________________________

	From: rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
	Sent: 05 August 2010 13:14
	To: rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
	Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war fileis
nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
	
	
	This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev mailing
list for a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)
	
	Mark
	On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote: 

		thankfully it didn't do that...  

		but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me
enough enough times that I still remember it.
		
		
		On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
<manstis1 at ford.com> wrote:
		

			..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)


________________________________

				
				From: rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
				
				Sent: 05 August 2010 12:06
				To: Rules Dev List
				Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war
file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
				
				
				no I think it was more that OS-X finder
would unzip the zip, and then unzip the war, and you end up with a
drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.  

				Distributing it as a war makes sense. 
				
				
				On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis,
Michael (M.) <manstis1 at ford.com> wrote:
				

				So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip
then?
				 
				(Says he with little experience of maven
packaging) 


________________________________

				From: rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
				Sent: 05 August 2010 11:47
				To: Rules Dev List
				Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war
file is now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
				
				
				yeah zipping the war sometimes caused
hassles for OS-X users (I know tripped me up) so its a good thing to do
this (but want to set the web context or rename when deploying !).
				
				
				On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark
Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
				

				 On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael
(M.) wrote:
				> I like the new format - I like version
numbers in filenames so you can
				> differentiate.
				>
				> I can always change the web-context at
deployment time if I like.
				
				Previuosly it was
				drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
				 -- drools-guvnor.war
				
				So the zip was versioned, just the
contained .war wasn't. I didn't see
				the point in zipping a single war. But I
can move back to that, so the
				main download artifact is versioned, but
the war isn't....
				
				Mark
				
				> -----Original Message-----
				> From:
rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
				>
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
				> Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
				> To: rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
				> Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1
war file is now namedas
				> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
				>
				>
				>    On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu
wrote:
				>> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war
file is now named as
				>> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way
users have to change the default url
				>> to things like
http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
				>> mistake or intended?
				> Previously it was a versioned zip that
had an unversioned war in it. As
				> a war is already compressed it seemed
pointless compressing it in
				> another archive.
				>
				> Users can just rename the .war if they
like, stripping the version. Or
				> we can change it back to placing hte
.war inside of the .zip.
				>
				> What do people want?
				>
				> Mark
				>> Cheers,
				>> Jervis
				>>
				>>
_______________________________________________
				>> rules-dev mailing list
				>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
				>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
				>>
				>>
				>
				>
_______________________________________________
				> rules-dev mailing list
				> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
				>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
				>
				>
_______________________________________________
				> rules-dev mailing list
				> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
				>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
				>
				>
				
				
	
_______________________________________________
				rules-dev mailing list
				rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
	
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
				




				-- 
				Michael D Neale
				home: www.michaelneale.net
				blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
				


	
_______________________________________________
				rules-dev mailing list
				rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
	
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
				
				




				-- 
				Michael D Neale
				home: www.michaelneale.net
				blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
				


			_______________________________________________
			rules-dev mailing list
			rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
	
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
			
			




		-- 
		Michael D Neale
		home: www.michaelneale.net
		blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
		
		
		_______________________________________________
		rules-dev mailing list
		rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
		https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20100805/5a2f18c3/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the rules-dev mailing list