[rules-dev] Regex bug in JDK 5

[Wolfgang Laun]

Oops, sorry. I already got one -- from Mark for missing this. But I did
document the issue in the Jira and the code, so it should be clear to
everybody.
-W

On 25 December 2010 13:06, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:

> Nice :) Thanks for fixing. So JBRULES-2849 can be closed?
>
> Next time add the jira issue id in the commit comment JBRULES-2849
> that way the commit will be shown in the jira issue (once they enable
> git integration in jira)
>
> With kind regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
> Op 25-12-10 11:57, Wolfgang Laun schreef:
> > JDK 5 doesn't handle lookbehind assertions correctly if they contain
> > alternatives. The fallout from this bug has been cleared up by my
> > release
> >
> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm/commit/f3a50273c91ac697b6f1a0936ce96a44c3b38250
> >
> > I have added comments to clarify the nature of the "strange" workaround
> > regex part that's now being used, which also affects the JUnit tests. If
> > JDK 5 is dropped from the has-to-be-compatible-with list of Java
> > releases, the simpler regex construct might be used again.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Wolfgang
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20101225/594d7eaa/attachment.html