[rules-dev] [vote] Module drools-assistent moved into drools-ide-common

Geoffrey De Smet ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com
Wed Oct 27 02:35:50 EDT 2010


If drools-assistent needs to be implemented in guvnor and the eclipse 
plugin,
it should be added to drools-ide-common IIRC :)

Op 27-10-10 07:42, Lucas Amador schreef:
> Ideally it should remain as a separated module, so it can be implemented
> in guvnor and the plugin. But maybe it could be moved to a new folder
> together with the other modules that aren't functional to drools itself.
>
> On 27 October 2010 01:48, Michael Neale <michael.neale at gmail.com
> <mailto:michael.neale at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Yes - that is right - I forgot the name of it. So the stand alone
>     module needs to stay - or is the source code being merged in with
>     plugin codebase?
>
>
>     On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Lucas Amador <lucazamador at gmail.com
>     <mailto:lucazamador at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         Hi all,
>         drools-assistant is the module that I created to add refactoring
>         support in the eclipse plugin/guvnor. The last weekend I fixed
>         the integration with eclipse and they will be commited in the
>         next days, maybe tomorrow :)
>
>         Regards,
>
>         Lucas
>
>         On 26 October 2010 23:09, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org
>         <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
>             On 26/10/2010 22:57, Michael Anstis wrote:
>>             Hi Geoffrey,
>>
>>             Being relatively new I can't comment on some of the
>>             specifics, but I question the following:-
>>
>>                 * drools-assistant
>>                 * drools-atom
>>                 * drools-clips (I believe Mark did this on a rainy
>>                   weekend, but don't know if it's still supported).
>>                 * drools-container
>>                 * drools-doc\drools-docs (which is actively used?!? Do
>>                   we need both?)
>>                 * drools-rhq-plugin
>>                 * drools-simulator
>>                 * install
>>                 * src
>>
>>             I have thought for a long time I'd be good to have on the
>>             Wiki a summary of what each project represents and what
>>             package (JAR) they bundle into.
>             You just volunteered yourself for your first task next
>             november when you start ;)
>
>             Mark
>
>>
>>             Cheers,
>>
>>             Mike
>>
>>             On 26 October 2010 15:59, Geoffrey De Smet
>>             <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>>
>>             wrote:
>>
>>                 I am looking at cleaning up the build and moving to
>>                 maven 3, to make it
>>                 faster, more reliable, etc.
>>                 I am also actively wondering if some modules or files
>>                 aren't dead code.
>>                 First candidate is drools-atom:
>>
>>                 The module drools-atom is in limbo:
>>                 - It still exists
>>                 - It's not part of any build
>>                 - Does it still build? No
>>                 -- 'dependencies.dependency.version' is missing for
>>                 org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs:jar
>>                 - Does it still compile against the latest drools
>>                 version? Idunno, but
>>                 since it's not part of the build, tomorrow's refactor
>>                 might break it.
>>                 - Does anyone use it? If it doesn't build and it isn't
>>                 released... no?
>>
>>                 I don't think that code is useful to anyone in this
>>                 state. I do think
>>                 it's presence alone slightly complicates the drools
>>                 sources.
>>
>>
>>                 What do we do with it?
>>                 - [A] remove the directory drools-atom from trunk
>>                 (it's still retired in
>>                 in subversion)
>>                 - [B] leave it like it is now. It might be usefull to
>>                 someone
>>                 - [C] add it to the build again, make it work
>>                 - [D] create a separate repository "drools-incubator"
>>                 and move it there
>>
>>                 In my opinion:
>>                 +1 for [A]
>>                 -1 for [B]: either it builds or it's not in trunk
>>
>>
>>                 If we all agree that removing dead modules is a good
>>                 idea, I 'll provide
>>                 a list of possible candidates next time.
>>
>>                 --
>>                 With kind regards,
>>                 Geoffrey De Smet
>>
>>                 _______________________________________________
>>                 rules-dev mailing list
>>                 rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>                 <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>                 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             rules-dev mailing list
>>             rules-dev at lists.jboss.org  <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>             https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             rules-dev mailing list
>             rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>             https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         rules-dev mailing list
>         rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Michael D Neale
>     home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
>     blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rules-dev mailing list
>     rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

-- 
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet



More information about the rules-dev mailing list