[rules-dev] [result] Module drools-atom removed

Geoffrey De Smet ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com
Thu Oct 28 03:32:57 EDT 2010


Done, tnx :)

Op 28-10-10 04:38, Jervis Liu schreef:
> Michael Neale wrote:
>> I don't think it is used or needed. Can archive it off unless anyone
>> says otherwise.
>>
>>
> Yes, its a dead code. We can safely remove it.
>
> Jervis
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Geoffrey De Smet
>> <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com<mailto:ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>>  wrote:
>>
>>      I am looking at cleaning up the build and moving to maven 3, to
>>      make it
>>      faster, more reliable, etc.
>>      I am also actively wondering if some modules or files aren't dead
>>      code.
>>      First candidate is drools-atom:
>>
>>      The module drools-atom is in limbo:
>>      - It still exists
>>      - It's not part of any build
>>      - Does it still build? No
>>      -- 'dependencies.dependency.version' is missing for
>>      org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs:jar
>>      - Does it still compile against the latest drools version? Idunno, but
>>      since it's not part of the build, tomorrow's refactor might break it.
>>      - Does anyone use it? If it doesn't build and it isn't released... no?
>>
>>      I don't think that code is useful to anyone in this state. I do think
>>      it's presence alone slightly complicates the drools sources.
>>
>>
>>      What do we do with it?
>>      - [A] remove the directory drools-atom from trunk (it's still
>>      retired in
>>      in subversion)
>>      - [B] leave it like it is now. It might be usefull to someone
>>      - [C] add it to the build again, make it work
>>      - [D] create a separate repository "drools-incubator" and move it
>>      there
>>
>>      In my opinion:
>>      +1 for [A]
>>      -1 for [B]: either it builds or it's not in trunk
>>
>>
>>      If we all agree that removing dead modules is a good idea, I 'll
>>      provide
>>      a list of possible candidates next time.
>>
>>      --
>>      With kind regards,
>>      Geoffrey De Smet
>>
>>      _______________________________________________
>>      rules-dev mailing list
>>      rules-dev at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>      https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>

-- 
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet




More information about the rules-dev mailing list