[rules-dev] [rules-users] copyright violation issue on Drools

[Yusuke Yamamoto]

Just saying no can be done in a second.
I've been waiting for over two months and he's supposed to explain why.

Thanks for feeding me again!

Yusuke

On Sep 2, 2010, at 12:03 AM, Mark Proctor wrote:

>  On 01/09/2010 15:38, Yusuke Yamamoto wrote:
>> Actually I contacted Red Hat's QA engineers first.
>> And they told me that legal dept. - Richard Fontana - will get back to me.
>> But so far I got no meaningful response. And it's been over two months.
> The response was meaningful, it just wasn't the response you wanted. He 
> said no, and that the matter is closed.
> 
> Mark
>> On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:29 PM, Eric Schabell wrote:
>> 
>>> I think someone needs to look a bit closer at this story, as you have the PROJECT Drools which is not the same as the PRODUCTS produced and supported by Red Hat.
>>> 
>>> Red Hat does  not 'own' the Drools project, it just sponsors the project a lot and pays some of the developers to do what they do.
>>> 
>>> I am not surprised that Red Hat legal dept does not respond, they have nothing to respond to.
>>> 
>>> Regards, erics
>>> 
>>> ----- "Yusuke Yamamoto"<yamamoyu at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>> I understand you, but Red Hat legal dept. doesn't responding and there's no other place to talk this matter.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev