[rules-dev] Clean up your topic branches on the github reference repository

Leonardo Gomes leonardo.f.gomes at gmail.com
Mon Jan 24 09:52:03 EST 2011


Hi,

I'm planning to get rid of "lr_unlinking_20101116" over the weekend.

Cheers,
Leonardo.

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Esteban Aliverti <
esteban.aliverti at gmail.com> wrote:

> trunk_20100722_esteban_diega branch and tag are no longer among us :(
> I have also deleted guvnor_expressionEditor3_baunax_esteban_20100202 tag
>
> Best Regards,
>
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
> - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
> - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Geoffrey De Smet <
> ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> In the github reference repository
>>   https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm
>> we have /release branches/, such as 4.0.x, 5,0.x, 5.1.x, 5.2.0.M1.x, ...
>> which is fine,
>> but also topic branches which clutter our reference repository.
>>
>> Following the conventions of other projects, we'd like to move all topic
>> branches out of the github reference repository, by:
>>
>>    * 1) Removing the topic branch if it has been merged into master
>>      long ago and has become irrelevant
>>    * 2) Keep the topic branch local (if it's short-lived) until it's
>>      merged into master
>>    * 3) Forking the reference repository on github and push your topic
>>      branches there, until it's merged into master
>>          o For example, edson's fork:
>>            https://github.com/etirelli/droolsjbpm
>>
>> Here's a list of the topic branches that we want to get rid of.
>> If one of them is yours, please read on.
>>
>>    * Branch_4_0_2_SOA_4_2
>>    * DRLv6
>>    * DROOLS_4_0_2_SOA_4_2_GA
>>    * DroolsChance
>>    * K200
>>    * effective_dated
>>    * guvnor-pre-guided-changes-june-09
>>    * kstam_guvnor_modeshape
>>    * lr_unlinking_20101116
>>    * persistence_refactor
>>    * rete_using_static_methods_aug2009trunk_20100722_esteban_diega
>>
>> If 1) applies and it has been merged into master long ago and has become
>> irrelevant, then just remove it with this command:
>> $ git push origin :<branchname>
>> For example:
>> $ git push origin :kstam_guvnor_modeshape
>>
>> If 2) or 3) applies, its a bit more difficult, but I'll make a blog in a
>> few weeks on how to fork and do social coding.
>>
>> --
>> With kind regards,
>> Geoffrey De Smet
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110124/7d0fbebf/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-dev mailing list