[rules-dev] Issues with fixing duplicate rule name declarations in separate resource files.

[Mark Proctor]

On 09/07/2011 23:59, Mikael Lönneberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In trying to fix JBRULES-2730 and JBRULES-3063, I noticed that fixing 
> this issue will actually break MiscTest#testRuleReplacement.
> So should this test case be rewritten to not allow rule replacement, 
> or are there circumstances where rule replacements are allowed and if 
> that is the case what are those circumstances?
Rule replacement is allowed and an important part of a dynamic rule 
engine. I believe what we do is disallow it from the same resource 
(should double check that) i.e. a drl that repeats the rule twice is an 
error. If you load a later resource it will overwrite the previous.
>
> ConsequenceOffsetTest.testConsequenceOffset also fails due to loading 
> two resource files with the same package and rule name defined in the 
> different files.
>
Sounds like a bug, can you update some stronger tests and fix?

Mark
>
> Kind regards
>
> Mikael Lonneberg - gwendo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110710/5c6bbd32/attachment.html