[rules-dev] Smooth operator

[Michael Anstis]

The current conversation on IRC might benefit form your simplified test
case?!?

On 22 June 2011 16:24, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:

> Given a scant selection of facts taken from java.lang.Integer and
> java.lang.Long (no value exceeds  and a rule base with just 4 rules using
> simple constraints using nothing but the fact values, a single operator
> besides "==", it compiles and executes according to my expectations.
>
> Getting high-spirited, I added
>
>    dialect "mvel";
>
> to my DRL file and re-run everything. Lo and behold! Some rules don't fire
> any more!
>
> Is this to be expected? (There is no difference between 5.1.1 and 5.2.x.)
>
> Cheers
> Wolfgang
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110622/633188c3/attachment.html