[rules-dev] Formal verification of Drools - master's thesis

[Wolfgang Laun]

On 19 September 2011 17:57, Mauricio Salatino <salaboy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jiri,
> Drools Verifier do that for you? Am I right?
>

I think this is a misunderstanding. Looking at Drools' Java code takes a
Java bug finding program such as findbugs. What Drools Verifier does is:
look at DRL code written by Drools users.

Findbugs applied to Drools code is a good idea, but I would opt for this to
include fundamental code that's *used *by Drools and responsible for a
considerable number of JIRAs.

-W



> Toni Rikkola is the man behind drools verifier, you can talk with him to
> improve what he has now. I know that Esteban was also playing with that and
> adding the concept of Working Set. You can talk with him as well.
> Cheers
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ansgar Konermann <
> ansgar.konermann at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> If I'm eligible to vote, please go for option 1.
>> Am 19.09.2011 17:14 schrieb "Jiri Svitak" <jsvitak at redhat.com>:
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>  - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
>  - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
> - Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
>  - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
>
>  - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110919/ee96f879/attachment.html