[rules-dev] Cell() PropertySpecific Behaviour

[Wolfgang Laun]

There was a brief discussion about annotation class names a few days
ago - has this been finalized, and if so, what is the result?

Thanks
Wolfgang

On 16 February 2012 18:26, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:

> We are just fine tuning PropertySpecific behahviour.
>
> Initially a pattern without any properties' mask was set to
> LONG.MAX_VALUE so that it responded to any field changes.
>
> However we've now changed it to 0, so Cell() will respond to the initial
> insertion, but it will not respond to any modifies.
>
> Should you want it to respond to modifies you must add @watch(*).
>
> The other aspect is that we are adding a kbuillder configration to set
> the default behaviour. Currently it is off. With it defaulting to off
> using PropertySpecific as an annotation makes sense. If we default it to
> on you then need to use PropertySpecific(true). i.e. the reversing of
> the logic means for the common case we now need an argument. Considering
> this common case will become default at some point in the future, i.e.
> you want the parameterless version to be the common use case.
> NonPropertySpecific is a bit long :)
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20120216/174cb2c9/attachment.html