[rules-dev] Breaking Changes Suggestions

[Mark Proctor]

query can somewhat help for re-usable elements, as per "Add CE 
templates".  You can wrap elements in a query and use that inside a 
rule, remember our queries are reactive if you leave off the ?.

Mark

On 27/03/2012 10:02, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> I've collected a few things I've been moaning about... They are
> intended to make DRL programming more convenient, given the current
> set of the Engine's capabilities, i.e., enhance Drools' usability!
>
> AFAIK, none of these proposals would break backward compatibility.
>
> Cheers
> Wolfgang
>
>
> On 27/03/2012, Mark Proctor<mproctor at codehaus.org>  wrote:
>> I've put up a wiki page to collect thoughts on ideas that would involve
>> breaking backwards compatability in Drools. It's aimed to produce ideas
>> for Drools 6.0.
>>
>> No suggestion is too silly, think of it as a brainstorming area for
>> alternative syntaxes and behaviours to what we have now, so knock
>> yourself out.
>> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/BreakingChangesSuggestions
>>
>> Mark
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev