[rules-dev] cr1
Michael Anstis
michael.anstis at gmail.com
Wed Oct 17 04:30:14 EDT 2012
Hi,
These are the current issues....
*http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/drools-5.5.x/*
Failing tests:
http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/drools-5.5.x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
- org.drools.integrationtests.MultithreadTest.testSlidingTimeWindows
*http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jbpm-5.4.x/*
Failing tests:
http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jbpm-5.4.x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
-
org.jbpm.bpmn2.SimpleBPMNProcessTest.testMultipleStartEventsStartOnTimer
*http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/guvnor-5.5.x/*
Failing tests:
http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/guvnor-5.5.x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
- AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testUpdateAssetFromAtom (RESTEasy
issue)
- AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAssetFromAtom (RESTEasy
issue)
- BasicPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAndUpdateAndDeletePackageFromAtom
(RESTEasy issue)
- CategoryResourceIntegrationTest.testGetAssetsCreatedByAtomByCategoryAsAtom
(RESTEasy issue)
Thanks to those concerned for fixing the failing tests from my previous
email.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 16 October 2012 08:51, Toni Rikkola <toni at rikkola.net> wrote:
> This test keeps passing for me locally. I'm using the 5.5.x branch.
>
> PackageAssemblerIntegrationTest.testFunctionWithFactType (Rikkola, is this
> as a result of the change I think you were making around Functions you were
> doing for Mario?)
>
> Toni
>
> On Oct 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Michael Anstis wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I will make the 5.5.x branch today.
>
> These are the current issues....
> *
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/*
>
> Failing tests:
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>
> - SpringDroolsTest.testConfiguration
>
>
> *http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/*
>
> Failing tests:
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>
> - ServiceImplementationIntegrationTest.testListUserPermissionsPagedResults
> (jliu, could you please take a look?)
> - PackageAssemblerIntegrationTest.testFunctionWithFactType (Rikkola,
> is this as a result of the change I think you were making around Functions
> you were doing for Mario?)
> - AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testUpdateAssetFromAtom
> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
> - AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAssetFromAtom
> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
> - BasicPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAndUpdateAndDeletePackageFromAtom
> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
> - CategoryResourceIntegrationTest.testGetAssetsCreatedByAtomByCategoryAsAtom
> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
>
>
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/
>
> Failing tests:
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>
> - BPMN2OsgiTest.testMinimalProcess
> - SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiPlatformStarts
> - SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiEnvironment
> - SimpleOsgiTest.testCompiler
> - SimpleOsgiTest.testDecisionTable
>
> Who is going to volunteer to look into the Spring and OSGi failing tests?
> ;)
>
> For those who may not already be aware, due to a RESTEasy issue (
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-782) the Atom REST API in Guvnor
> only works with AS7.0.1.
>
> Any pressure that can be applied to get the RESTEasy team to fix this
> would be welcome as it is required for jBPM Designer to work with Guvnor on
> AS7.1.x.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Mike
>
> On 13 October 2012 17:12, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>
>> We should try and wrap up CR1 this week. This release will never be
>> productised, so quicker we can switch to 6.0 the better. We have a month to
>> produce a stable "runtime" core, 6.0-alpha1, where we promise binary
>> compatibility to other groups in SOA.
>>
>> I'll send an email explaining 6.0-alpha1 for monday.
>>
>> Mark
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20121017/59570672/attachment-0001.html
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list