[rules-dev] cr1
Jervis Liu
jliu at redhat.com
Wed Oct 17 04:40:52 EDT 2012
Michael Anstis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These are the current issues....
>
> *http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/drools-5.5.x/*
>
> Failing tests:
> http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/drools-5.5.x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>
> * org.drools.integrationtests.MultithreadTest.testSlidingTimeWindows
>
>
> *http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jbpm-5.4.x/*
>
> Failing tests:
> http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jbpm-5.4.x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>
> * org.jbpm.bpmn2.SimpleBPMNProcessTest.testMultipleStartEventsStartOnTimer
>
>
> *http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/guvnor-5.5.x/*
>
> Failing tests:
> http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/guvnor-5.5.x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>
> * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testUpdateAssetFromAtom
> (RESTEasy issue)
> * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAssetFromAtom
> (RESTEasy issue)
> * BasicPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAndUpdateAndDeletePackageFromAtom
> (RESTEasy issue)
> * CategoryResourceIntegrationTest.testGetAssetsCreatedByAtomByCategoryAsAtom
> (RESTEasy issue)
>
Just applied RESTEasy's patch. We should see a green guvnor build soon.
Jervis
>
> Thanks to those concerned for fixing the failing tests from my
> previous email.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Mike
>
> On 16 October 2012 08:51, Toni Rikkola <toni at rikkola.net
> <mailto:toni at rikkola.net>> wrote:
>
> This test keeps passing for me locally. I'm using the 5.5.x branch.
>
> PackageAssemblerIntegrationTest.testFunctionWithFactType (Rikkola,
> is this as a result of the change I think you were making around
> Functions you were doing for Mario?)
>
> Toni
>
> On Oct 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Michael Anstis wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I will make the 5.5.x branch today.
>>
>> These are the current issues....
>> *
>> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/*
>>
>> Failing tests:
>> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>>
>> * SpringDroolsTest.testConfiguration
>>
>>
>> *http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/*
>>
>> Failing tests:
>> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>>
>> * ServiceImplementationIntegrationTest.testListUserPermissionsPagedResults
>> (jliu, could you please take a look?)
>> * PackageAssemblerIntegrationTest.testFunctionWithFactType
>> (Rikkola, is this as a result of the change I think you
>> were making around Functions you were doing for Mario?)
>> * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testUpdateAssetFromAtom
>> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
>> * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAssetFromAtom
>> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
>> * BasicPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAndUpdateAndDeletePackageFromAtom
>> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
>> * CategoryResourceIntegrationTest.testGetAssetsCreatedByAtomByCategoryAsAtom
>> (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
>>
>>
>> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/
>>
>> Failing tests:
>> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>>
>> * BPMN2OsgiTest.testMinimalProcess
>> * SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiPlatformStarts
>> * SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiEnvironment
>> * SimpleOsgiTest.testCompiler
>> * SimpleOsgiTest.testDecisionTable
>>
>> Who is going to volunteer to look into the Spring and OSGi
>> failing tests? ;)
>>
>> For those who may not already be aware, due to a RESTEasy issue
>> (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-782) the Atom REST API
>> in Guvnor only works with AS7.0.1.
>>
>> Any pressure that can be applied to get the RESTEasy team to fix
>> this would be welcome as it is required for jBPM Designer to work
>> with Guvnor on AS7.1.x.
>>
>> With kind regards,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On 13 October 2012 17:12, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org
>> <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>>
>> We should try and wrap up CR1 this week. This release will
>> never be productised, so quicker we can switch to 6.0 the
>> better. We have a month to produce a stable "runtime" core,
>> 6.0-alpha1, where we promise binary compatibility to other
>> groups in SOA.
>>
>> I'll send an email explaining 6.0-alpha1 for monday.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list