[rules-dev] Guvnor split-up

Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun at gmail.com
Tue Apr 2 05:29:51 EDT 2013


Nobody ever proposed a "software loom". Hits too close to home, eh?
-W

On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:
> LOL.
>
> Why re-invent the wheel indeed... unless Mark wants better separation of
> terms for "guvnor" and "uberfire" (that is our workbench framework)...
> Mark?
>
> "Bench" is good for me (in fact, I'm pretty comfortable with anything.. as
> much I care.. I just don't want to have to do the renaming twice). Taking
> it further, why not simply "Drools Workbench": org.drools.wb.
>
> On 2 April 2013 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about "Integrated Work Studio"
>> > instead of "Environment"?
>> >
>>
>> Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench.
>> Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future?
>>
>> -W
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>


More information about the rules-dev mailing list